Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120

Shimano Cardiff 201A
Multireels
35.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/315. 0.25/255, 0.30/195 lb-yds: 8/230, 10/210, 14/120
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C5000X clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 201A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and gear ratio (4.7). While Shimano Cardiff 201A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano AERO XR C5000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Shimano Cardiff 201A?
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
