Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C5000X clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 301A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and gear ratio (4.7). While Shimano Cardiff 301A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano AERO XR C5000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Shimano Cardiff 301A?
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Beastmaster


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25
