Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €121.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR 4000X clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and ball bearings (5+1). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano AERO XR 4000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Shimano AERO XR 4000X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Rated 8.6 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Delphin RAYA body


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Delphin RAYA body


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Delphin RAYA body vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
