Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €121.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR 4000X edges out Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (5+1) and the gear ratio (4.7). Still, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Shimano AERO XR 4000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.6 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- With a line retrieve of 75 centimeter / 29.53 inch (5.71 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
