Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €121.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR 4000X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and gear ratio (4.7). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano AERO XR 4000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano AERO XR 4000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
