Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €121.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Both Shimano AERO XR 4000X and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano AERO XR 4000X offers a ball bearings of 5+1, while Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 stands out for a durability of 5.73 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Shimano AERO XR 4000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.6 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
