Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €121.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Both Shimano AERO XR 4000X and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano AERO XR 4000X offers a ball bearings of 5+1, while Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Shimano AERO XR 4000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.6 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Delphin REDIX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX
