Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €121.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
84.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €407.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Both Shimano AERO XR 4000X and Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano AERO XR 4000X offers a ball bearings of 5+1, while Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Shimano Vanquish FC?
Shimano AERO XR 4000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX
