Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €114.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
47.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.41 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight176g / 6.21oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/290
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C3000X clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and ball bearings (5+1). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano AERO XR C3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Delphin ANTIGRAVITY?
Shimano AERO XR C3000X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- With a line retrieve of 73 centimeter / 28.74 inch (5.43 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Delphin FRIZ vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX
