Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €114.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
67.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank56 centimeter / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/255
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C3000X edges out Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (5+1) and the maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs). Still, Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X holds its own with strengths like a durability of 8.59 out of 10 and a ergonomics of 6.33 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Shimano AERO XR C3000X
- With a line retrieve of 73 centimeter / 28.74 inch (5.43 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
