Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €114.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Penn International VISW
Multireels
67.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.68 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.1:1/1.4:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight1590g / 56.09oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €559.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/1270
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C3000X edges out Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and the weight (210g / 7,41oz). Still, Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 104 centimeter / 40.94 inch and a durability of 5.68 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Penn International VISW?
Shimano AERO XR C3000X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Rated 8.8 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X
