Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €114.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Penn International VISW
Multireels
64.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.98 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag29.4kg / 64,82lbs
Weight3205g / 113.05oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €979.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size80
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.76/1435
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C3000X edges out Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and the weight (210g / 7,41oz). Still, Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch and a durability of 5.98 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Penn International VISW?
Shimano AERO XR C3000X
- This reel ensures a smooth and efficient retrieve, great for consistent casting and control in feeder and match fishing
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Rated 8.8 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
