Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €114.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C3000X edges out Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (5+1) and the weight (210g / 7,41oz). Still, Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 5.5 out of 10 and a gear ratio of 5.3:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Penn Slammer IV?
Shimano AERO XR C3000X
- Rated 8.8 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- With a line retrieve of 73 centimeter / 28.74 inch (5.43 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
