Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €114.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Both Shimano AERO XR C3000X and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano AERO XR C3000X offers a weight of 210g / 7,41oz, while Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Shimano AERO XR C3000X
- This reel ensures a smooth and efficient retrieve, great for consistent casting and control in feeder and match fishing
- Rated 8.8 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
