Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €114.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C3000X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and total score (8.1 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano AERO XR C3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R?
Shimano AERO XR C3000X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Rated 8.8 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
Similar comparisons

Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
