Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C5000X edges out Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (5+1) and the gear ratio (4.7). Still, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.57 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X
