Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C5000X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and gear ratio (4.7). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano AERO XR C5000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
