Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Both Shimano AERO XR C5000X and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano AERO XR C5000X offers a ball bearings of 5+1, while Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 stands out for a durability of 5.73 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.57 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Delphin RAYA body vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX
