Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Both Shimano AERO XR C5000X and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano AERO XR C5000X offers a ball bearings of 5+1, while Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.57 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX
