Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
84.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight145g / 5.11oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Both Shimano AERO XR C5000X and Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano AERO XR C5000X offers a ball bearings of 5+1, while Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Shimano Vanquish FC?
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
