Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
84.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €407.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Both Shimano AERO XR C5000X and Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano AERO XR C5000X offers a ball bearings of 5+1, while Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Shimano Vanquish FC?
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
