Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120

Shimano Cardiff 201A
Multireels
35.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/315. 0.25/255, 0.30/195 lb-yds: 8/230, 10/210, 14/120
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C5000X clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 201A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and gear ratio (4.7). While Shimano Cardiff 201A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano AERO XR C5000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Shimano Cardiff 201A?
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Delphin REDIX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
