Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD vs Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF

Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD
Seafishing
75.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio2.4:1
Maximum drag43kg / 94.8lbs
Weight2300g / 81.13oz
Line retireve per crank53 centimeter / 20.87 inch
Ball bearings20
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €1,245.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/1660

Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF
Seafishing
58.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.9 out of 10
Ergonomics5.41 out of 10
Gear ratio4.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight695g / 24.52oz
Line retireve per crank97 centimeter / 38.19 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €43.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/460
Conclusion
Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD edges out Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (43kg / 94,8lbs) and the durability (9.5 out of 10). Still, Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 97 centimeter / 38.19 inch and a gear ratio of 4.3:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD and Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF?
Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD
- With a drag score of 10 out of 10 (43kg / 94,8lbs), the reel is built to handle serious pressure from large saltwater predators
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF
- Scoring 8.2 out of 10 (4.3:1), this reel offers a faster line retrieval, making it a good option for chasing pelagics or (and in practice useful for to quickly reset)
- Scoring 8.01 out of 10 (695g / 24,52oz), this reel is lighter than expected for a saltwater model, which helps on long sessions without extra strain
- With a fast retrieve 97 centimeter / 38.19 inch, the reel helps you stay on top of fast runs and cover water efficiently
- A bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4) provides decent smoothness with moderate corrosion resistance
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX vs Shimano TLD 15X


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 5000-HX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX


Shimano TLD 15X vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 20000-HX


Shimano Spheros SW SP4000XGSWX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 5000-HX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 5000-HX vs Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX


Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 20000-HX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000PGX vs Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX vs Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P


Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Shimano TLD 15X


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX


Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 20000-HX vs Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX vs Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-XHX


Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
