Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD
Seafishing
75.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio2.4:1
Maximum drag43kg / 94.8lbs
Weight2300g / 81.13oz
Line retireve per crank53 centimeter / 20.87 inch
Ball bearings20
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €1,245.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/1660

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120
Conclusion
Both Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD and Shimano AERO XR C5000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano AERO XR C5000X stands out for a ball bearings of 5+1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.57 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 20000-HX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 6000 HGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 8000 HGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 20000-HX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX
