Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD
Seafishing
75.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio2.4:1
Maximum drag43kg / 94.8lbs
Weight2300g / 81.13oz
Line retireve per crank53 centimeter / 20.87 inch
Ball bearings20
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €1,245.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/1660

Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
Spinning
52.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank73cm / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 SFI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.16mm-150m / 0.18mm-120m / 0.20mm-95m
Conclusion
Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD clearly outshines Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (43kg / 94,8lbs). While Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD and Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI?
Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8.64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73cm / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 HGX


Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX


Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 14000 XGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 18000 HGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 14000 XGX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX
