Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Beastmaster
Multireels
81.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1485g / 52.38oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,149.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/650

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X edges out Shimano Beastmaster with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the weight (305g / 10,76oz). Still, Shimano Beastmaster holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Beastmaster and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Shimano Beastmaster
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.26 out of 10 (305g / 10,76oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
