Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Beastmaster
Multireels
81.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1485g / 52.38oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,149.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/650

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
60.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Shimano Beastmaster clearly outshines Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). While Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Beastmaster is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Beastmaster and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT?
Shimano Beastmaster
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX
- The 5 out of 10 (4.8:1) gear ratio gives you the power you need to handle heavy lures and strong large fish out of cover
- With a score like 8.43 out of 10 (235g / 8,29oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X
