Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Beastmaster
Multireels
81.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1485g / 52.38oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,149.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/650

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
89.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €179.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Beastmaster and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Beastmaster offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Beastmaster and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Shimano Beastmaster
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX
