Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Beastmaster
Multireels
81.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1485g / 52.38oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,149.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/650

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Beastmaster and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Beastmaster offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Beastmaster and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Shimano Beastmaster
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H
