Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Beastmaster
Multireels
81.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1485g / 52.38oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,149.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/650

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Beastmaster and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Beastmaster offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Beastmaster and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Shimano Beastmaster
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX
