Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Beastmaster
Multireels
81.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1485g / 52.38oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,149.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/650

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Beastmaster and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Beastmaster offers a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Beastmaster and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X
