Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Beastmaster
Multireels
81.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1485g / 52.38oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,149.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/650

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag380kg / 837.76lbs
Weight380g / 13404oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33858 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €249.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Beastmaster and Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Beastmaster offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD stands out for a ball bearings of 8. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Beastmaster and Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD?
Shimano Beastmaster
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Delphin RAYA body


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
