Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Beastmaster
Multireels
81.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1485g / 52.38oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,149.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/650

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQR 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Shimano Beastmaster clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Beastmaster is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Beastmaster and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Shimano Beastmaster
- Scoring 8.53 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch), this reel pulls line in fast enough to keep you in control even during unpredictable runs
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X
