Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Beastmaster
Multireels
81.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1485g / 52.38oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,149.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/650

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 DH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Shimano Beastmaster edges out Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch) and the durability (9.5 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4+1 and a weight of 265g / 9,35oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Beastmaster and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.23 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X
