Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
86.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SHG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240
Conclusion
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in total score (8.63 out of 10) and durability (5.5 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff XR and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Shimano Stradic FM vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX
