Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
86.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SHG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €181.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Both Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX offers a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch, while Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff XR and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX
