Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
86.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SHG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €181.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Both Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX offers a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch, while Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff XR and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX
