Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
86.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SHG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €181.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Both Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX offers a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch, while Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff XR and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX
