Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
86.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SHG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX offers a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff XR and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin FRIZ vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Delphin FRIZ


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Delphin FRIZ vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Delphin FRIZ


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX
