Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
86.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SHG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX offers a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff XR and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX
