Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX
Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
86.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SHG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
69.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €84.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX edges out Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) and the gear ratio (6.1:1). Still, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a durability of 7.67 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff XR and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons
Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X
Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X
Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X
Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X
Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X
Delphin FRIZ vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Delphin FRIZ
Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX
Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Delphin FRIZ
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin FRIZ
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX
Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX