Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
86.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SHG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335
Conclusion
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX edges out Penn Battle III 8000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) and the weight (155g / 5,47oz). Still, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 13,6kg / 29,98lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff XR and Penn Battle III?
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX
- With a score like 8.97 out of 10 (155g / 5,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX
