Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X

Shimano Cardiff XR

Spinning

86.30 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.48 out of 10

Gear ratio6.1:1

Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs

Weight155g / 5.47oz

Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings10

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €219.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC2000SHG
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Penn FIERCE IV

Spinning

67.40 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.1 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs

Weight270g / 9.52oz

Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings4+1

Technical Specifications

BrandPENN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €62.40
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220

Conclusion

Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX edges out Penn FIERCE IV 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the total score (8.63 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). Still, Penn FIERCE IV 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4+1 and a durability of 7 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff XR and Penn FIERCE IV?

Penn FIERCE IV 2000X

Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.