Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X

Shimano Cardiff XR

Spinning

86.30 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.48 out of 10

Gear ratio6.1:1

Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs

Weight155g / 5.47oz

Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings10

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €219.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC2000SHG
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Penn FIERCE IV

Spinning

68.90 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.07 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag5.5kg / 12,13lbs

Weight280g / 9.88oz

Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch

Ball bearings4+1

Technical Specifications

BrandPENN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €65.70
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235

Conclusion

Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX edges out Penn FIERCE IV 2500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the total score (8.63 out of 10) and the weight (155g / 5,47oz). Still, Penn FIERCE IV 2500X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4+1 and a durability of 7 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff XR and Penn FIERCE IV?

Penn FIERCE IV 2500X

Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.