Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight395g / 13.93oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €199.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X edges out Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). Still, Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 155g / 5,47oz and a ergonomics of 6.48 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff XR and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
- A line retrieve score of 8.1 out of 10 86 centimeter / 33.86 inch), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX
