Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT
Feeder And Match
62.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.62 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight390g / 13.76oz
Line retireve per crank92 centimeter / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €75.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000SS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX edges out Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (155g / 5,47oz) and the ergonomics (6.48 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4 and a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff XR and Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT?
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX
- A line retrieve score of 8.7 out of 10 92 centimeter / 36.22 inch), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX
