Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag380kg / 837.76lbs
Weight380g / 13404oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33858 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €249.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD edges out Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the maximum drag (380kg / 837,76lbs). Still, Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 155g / 5,47oz and a ergonomics of 6.48 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff XR and Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD?
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
- A line retrieve score of 8.1 out of 10 86 centimeter / 33858 inch), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Delphin RAYA body


Delphin RAYA body vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
