Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight2040g / 71.96oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €603.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1200
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.42/1000
Conclusion
Both Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX and Daiwa TANACOM 1200X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX offers a weight of 155g / 5,47oz, while Daiwa TANACOM 1200X stands out for a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff XR and Daiwa TANACOM?
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.97 out of 10 (155g / 5,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX
