Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485
Conclusion
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX clearly outshines Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX, offering significantly better performance in weight (155g / 5,47oz) and gear ratio (5.1:1). While Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff XR and Penn Battle III Long Cast?
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.97 out of 10 (155g / 5,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Delphin INKS 5000X
