Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (3kg / 6,61lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff XR and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX
