Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (3kg / 6,61lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff XR and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX
