Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (3kg / 6,61lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff XR and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX
