Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (3kg / 6,61lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff XR and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
