Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (3kg / 6,61lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff XR and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X
