Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (3kg / 6,61lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff XR and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X
